|
Graduate Work
Beowulf and Beyond
Scott Hays
‘Beowulf’
and the Seven Deadly Sins
It occurred to me while reading Seamus
Heaney’s translation of the Old English
Beowulf, that perhaps there are
veiled references in the text to the Seven
Deadly Sins, a classification of vices used
in early Christian teachings to educate
and protect followers from basic human instincts.
My first inclination came during the initial
feast at Heorot, when Unferth engages Beowulf
in the art of flyting. The poet
writes, /Beowulf’s coming, his
sea-braving, made him [Unferth] sick with
envy/ (Line 502). Or later, during
the second celebration at Heorot, when King
Hrothgar warns Beowulf of the seductive
dangers of success after Beowulf defeats
Grendel’s mother. /O flower of
warriors, beware of that trap. Choose, dear
Beowulf, the better part, eternal rewards.
Do not give way to pride/ (Line 1760
).
Of course, Envy and Pride are two of the
Seven Deadly Sins.
But in order to connect-the-dots between
Beowulf and the Seven Deadly Sins,
it first needs to be established that the
Deadly Sins themselves were conceived sometime
prior to Beowulf, purportedly written
down during the 10th century by a Christian
scribe. As it turns out, they were indeed
conceived prior to the writing of Beowulf,
and it seems plausible the Christian poet
might have had access to these resources.
The origins of the Seven Deadly Sins, along
with their exact descriptions and purpose,
have baffled historians for centuries. Some,
like Oliver Nicholson, a professor in the
Medieval Studies Department at the University
of Minnesota, attributes the original list
of eight sins to a French ascetic
monk . Other historians have suggested a
Greek monastic theologian.
Around 400 AD, the early Christian poet
Prudentius drafted a poem titled Psychomachia
(“The Battle for the Soul”),
which tried to explain what people should
and should not do in order to keep their
souls free from sin. This poem included
a popular set of seven virtues that could
be used to cure their seven corresponding
vices. The message was clear: for every
battle between the spirit and the flesh,
there existed a Christian response. This
theme of spiritual warfare appealed to the
early Christian church, and the poem became
widely known within the Anglo-Saxon culture.
Then in the late 6th century, Pope Gregory
the Great in his work, Moralia in Job,
introduced the Seven Deadly Sins to illustrate
for laypersons of the church the need to
be mindful of sin. These eventually became
accepted as Pride, Greed, Envy, Sloth, Wrath,
Gluttony, and Lust.
Throughout the Middle Ages, many important
theological works were structured around
these seven deadly sins. The Christian church
hierarchy, for example, emphasized teaching
lay persons the Deadly Sins and their corresponding
heavenly virtues. Other spiritual manuals
embellished on this tradition.
While no list of these seven deadly sins
appears as such in the Bible itself, each
of them is condemned at various points in
the text. A list of seven sins that God
hates, for instance, is found in Proverbs
6:16-19 (King James Study Bible, 1988,
Genesis 4.1-16).
/These six things doth the Lord hate;
yeah, seven are an abomination unto him:
A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands
that shed innocent blood, a heart that deviseth
wicked imaginations, feet that be swift
in running to mischief, a false witness
that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord
among his brethren / (King James Study
Bible)
Pope Gregory apparently took personal interest
in the conversion of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms.
He believed these virtues would help counteract
worldly temptations that tended to align
themselves with the deadly sins. What a
perfect opportunity, then, to teach these
to countrymen who came from a pagan culture.
And although there’s no way of knowing
for certain whether or not the Christian
scribe who wrote Beowulf actually
read any of these resources, they certainly
were in wide circulation through oral narrative
for many years.
For the purposes of this paper, however,
I’ve decided to focus on only four
of the Seven Deadly Sins: Envy, Wrath, Gluttony,
and Pride.
Sick With Envy
Unferth is a Danish warrior who stands side-by-side
with his lord King Hrothgar in the hall
of Heorot, which comes under attack by the
powerful demon Grendel, who wages his “lonely
war, inflicting constant cruelties on the
people, atrocious hurt” (Lines 164-166).
And no one, especially not Unferth, can
do anything to stop the gruesome murders
by Grendel.
On the day Beowulf and his warriors arrive
from Geatland to help Hrothgar defeat the
demon, a feast is held in the banquet hall
in honor of the newly-arrived hero. Unferth
challenges Beowulf’s honor through
the art of flyting, an exchange
of insults that often centered on accusation
of cowardice.
Within the warrior culture, flyting
was often a proper and acceptable form of
self-assertion. It helped demonstrate rhetorical
skills, depict patriarchal lineage, and
assert heroic behavior and dominance. To
this end, Unferth chides Beowulf about a
swimming match he once lost in his youth.
/How you may have fared in every bout
and battle until now, this time you’ll
be worsted; no one has ever outlasted in
entire night against Grendel / (Lines
525-528 ).
Literary critics have suggested these slights
stemmed from Unferth’s shame at being
unable to protect Heorot himself . /He
could not brook or abide the face that anyone
else alive under heaven might enjoy greater
regard than he did / (Lines 503-505).
Of course, our hero Beowulf takes in all
in stride by first accusing Unferth of being
drunk, and then by retelling his version
of the swimming-match story. Beowulf then
calls into question Unferth’s manhood.
/The fact is, Unferth, if you were truly
as keen or courageous as you claim to be
Grendel would never have got away with such
unchecked atrocity, attacks on your king
havoc in Heorot and horrors everywhere/
(Lines 590-595 ).
And the laughter started, the din of the
crowed got louder, and Unferth continued
to /feel sick with envy /.
If indeed the Beowulf-poet had
wanted to introduce Christian tenets into
the pagan culture of Beowulf, this
seems like an ideal opportunity to introduce
the concept of envy. After all, we envy
what we do not have—real or imagined.
In a pagan culture, such as the one in Beowulf,
men might envy other men for their wealth
or power or prestige, so-called “earthly”
possessions that really should be of no
significance to a Medieval-Christian. To
that end, Unferth envies for what he does
not have—strength and courage. This
envy, in turn, leaves him emasculated and
humiliated in front of his fellow-warriors
in the mead-hall—a fate perhaps worse
than death in some pagan cultures. On the
other hand, if Unferth had adopted a more
“Christian” attitude, one without
envy, he might have welcomed Beowulf’s
help, avoided the verbal joust, and held
on to his standing in the community of Heorot
A Wrath for Grendel
The monster Grendel is a powerful demon
who grabs 30 men at one time and butchers
their corpses, feeds on their flesh. We
learn from the Beowulf-poet that Grendel
nursed a hard grievance. /It harrowed
him to hear the din of the loud banquet
every day in the hall, the harp being struck
and the clear song of a skilled poet telling
with mastery of man’s beginnings/
(Lines 87-91). The poet even hints that
behind Grendel’s wrath lies in his
loneliness and jealousy for being an outcast
among men. After all, he’s a descendant
of Cain who, according to the Bible, slew
his brother Abel and was thus cast east
of Eden where he would wander aimlessly,
thus beginning the long history of human
violence and man’s inhumanity to man.
Grendel has likewise been exiled to the
swamplands, outside the boundaries of human
existence. The Beowulf-poet seems
to suggest that the /God-cursed brute/
is guided by these vaguely human emotions
and impulses, which in turn fuel his deep
bitterness and wrath for conquest
during his night-raids on Heorot.
Grendel definitely is an outcast who seems
to long to be reinstated back into a society
of men. Spurned and joyless, the /shadow-stalker/
came /Greedily loping. The bane of the
race of men roamed forth, hunting for prey
in the high hall/ (711-713) and, maddening
for blood, ripping them of life limb-by-limb
until his death-battle with Beowulf, who
ultimately prevails by ripping the whole
of Grendel’s arm from his shoulder
.
Here, again, we can imagine the Beowulf-poet’s
desire to introduce the “Christian”
concept of sin. Wrath is often defined as
an extreme degree of anger to a grievance—real
or imagined, past or present. Grendel’s
wrath stems from his desire to be back among
men (having originally been cast east of
Eden). This built-up grievance over centuries
turns him literally into a monster who feeds
on strange flesh. The precise language may
not be there in the text, but a Christian-scribe
could easily have used the story of Grendel’s
wrath as an example of how a person should
not conduct himself in a Christian culture.
A Dragon Full of Gluttony
It’s roughly 50 years later and Beowulf,
now King of Geatland, face s yet another
unimaginable terror—the awakening
of great, fire-breathing dragon from the
/steep vaults of a stone-roofed barrow
where he guarded his hoard/ (Line 213).
But this time, Beowulf is much
older, and the emergence of the dragon throws
him into deep anguish and darkens his mood.
What arouses the Dragon from his lair is
a thief who steals a gem-covered goblet.
But as the Beowulf-poet states,
the goblet gained the thief nothing and
he /foresaw that his joy in the treasure
would be brief/ (2240-2241). The slick-skinned
dragon, however, begins to belch out flames
and burn bright homesteads, raze coastal
regions, and reduce forts and earthworks
to dust and ashes, leaving nothing alive
in his wake.
The Geat nation bore the /brunt of his
brutal assaults and virulent hate/ (2318-2320).
And Beowulf once again was called upon to
execute justice.
Gluttony is often defined as an unreasonable
consumption of more than necessary . The
dragon’s emphasis on the treasure
itself rehashes the moral ambiguity of “earthly”
possessions as compared to “heavenly”
possessions. If indeed the Beowulf-poet
had wanted to introduce the concept of gluttony
into the pagan culture of Beowulf, the idea
of a dragon guarding his horde—and
losing his life as a result of guarding
the horde—seems only appropriate.
Especially if the treasure isn’t much
to behold: rusty helmets all eaten away,
/as useless to men now as it ever was/
(Line 3168). Never mind the “earthly”
possessions, the Christian-scribe might
be thinking, where man needs to focus his
energies is on the “heavenly”
possessions.
Pride of the Geats
There comes a point in the poem, right after
Beowulf defeats Grendel’s
mother, that our hero comes across as somewhat
prideful. He has returned from his battle
with Grendel’s head on a spear, and
speaks the following words:
/And this I pledge, O prince of the
Shieldings: you can
sleep secure with your company of troops
in Heorot Hall.
Never need you fear for a single thane of
your sept or
nation, young warriors or old, that laying
waste of life
that you and your people endured of yore
/ (Lines 1671-1676)
But King Hrothgar is a great warrior himself,
although older and wiser. He’s aware
of both the privileges and perils of wealth
and power, and he warns young Beowulf
not to give way to pride and, to always
remember the blessings of God and the eternal
rewards in Heaven.
/For a brief while your strength is
in bloom but it fades
quickly; and soon there will follow illness
or the sword
to lay you low, or a sudden fire or surge
of water or jabbing blade or javelin for
the air or repellent age. Your piercing
eye will dim and darken; and death will
arrive, dear warrior, to sweep you away/
(Lines 1760-1768).
Pride is often defined as an excessive sense
of one’s own sense of self or dignity.
The Anglo-Saxon reader who was still living
in an heroic culture where boasting was
accepted, may not have appreciated Hrothgar’s
sermon to Beowulf. But the Beowulf-poet’s
intention is clear: the heroic code is often
in direct conflict with Christian values,
and the sin of pride often leads to a person’s
downfall. Consider Beowulf. Throughout his
life, Beowulf exemplified the perfect Anglo-Saxon
hero and leader. Yet for his battle with
the Dragon, he decides to handle it alone—too
proud to field a band of warriors.
/He had scant regard for the dragon
as a threat, no dread
at all of its courage or strength, for he
had kept going
often in the past, through perils and ordeals
of every sort, after he had purged Hrothgar’s
hall, triumphed in
Heorot and beaten Grendel. He out-grappled
the monster and his evil kin/ (2347-2354
)
In the end, Beowulf wins the battle
with the dragon but dies in the process,
mostly because his pride got in the way.
Often when one man follows his own will
many are hurt. This happened to us. Nothing
we advised could ever
convince the prince we loved, our land’s
guardian, not to vex the custodian of the
gold, let him let where he was long accustomed,
lurk there under earth until the end of
the world.
/He held to his high destiny. The hoard
is laid bare, but at a grave cost; it was
too cruel a fate that forced the king to
that encounter/ (Lines 3077-3086).
"As extensively as it honors Beowulf’s
greatness, the final scene of the poem comes
closer than any other to criticizing his
behavior. Wiglaf reflects that there may
have been an element of irresponsible in
Beowulf’s single-mindedness
and daring. His statement, in conjunction
with the earlier statement that Beowulf
was too proud to field a band of warriors
against the dragon, suggest that his actions,
perhaps, were imprudent and reckless. Much
like some of the other characters in the
poem who battled between the spirit and
the flesh, between the pagan regard for
“earthly” treasures and the
Christian conception of “heavily”
treasures, Between virtues and sins.
Works Cited
Fairlie, Henry. The Seven Deadly Sins Today.
Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre
Dame Press, 1978.
Heaney, Seamus. Beowulf: A Verse Translation.
New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2002.
Hill, Thomas D. “The Christian Language
and Theme of Beowulf” (from Companion
to Old English Poetry by Henk Aertsen and
Rolf H. Bremmer, Jr.). Amsterdam: VU University
Press, 1994.
King James Study Bible. Nashville: Thomas
Nelson Publishers, 1988.
top
|